Headlines
SC reserves order on government plea on Rafale documents
New Delhi, March 14
The Supreme Court on Thursday received its order on the government's plea claiming privilege over the documents filed by petitioners - former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, journalist-turned-politician Arun Shourie and activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan - in connection with the Rafale case.
After an hour-long hearing, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the order on the plea which also sought removal of the documents from the case records.
The Centre had on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the petitioners, who were seeking a review of the court's December 14 judgement giving a clean chit to the government in the Rafale deal, are guilty of leakage of sensitive information having a bearing on national security and combat capacity of the fighter jets.
In an affidavit, the government said the leaked information was now available to the "enemy/our adversaries", adding those who have conspired in this leakage were guilty of penal offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
The Centre had contended that the documents which were unauthorisedly photocopied belonged to a class for which it was "entitled to claim privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."
Asserting that the petitioners had "no authority" to produce the documents before the court without its "explicit permission", the affidavit says that these documents are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.
After an hour-long hearing, the bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the order on the plea which also sought removal of the documents from the case records.
The Centre had on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the petitioners, who were seeking a review of the court's December 14 judgement giving a clean chit to the government in the Rafale deal, are guilty of leakage of sensitive information having a bearing on national security and combat capacity of the fighter jets.
In an affidavit, the government said the leaked information was now available to the "enemy/our adversaries", adding those who have conspired in this leakage were guilty of penal offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code.
The Centre had contended that the documents which were unauthorisedly photocopied belonged to a class for which it was "entitled to claim privilege under Section 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872."
Asserting that the petitioners had "no authority" to produce the documents before the court without its "explicit permission", the affidavit says that these documents are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.
3 hours ago
Mexico-based Indian scientist leading fight against wheat diseases receives Padma Shri
7 hours ago
With assets of Rs 5,705 crore, TDP's NRI candidate from Guntur may be richest in fray
16 hours ago
Children’s Poetry Contest Held Jointly by HindiUSA and Maan Hindi Pariwar
16 hours ago
Indian American tech professional from California sentenced for fraud
16 hours ago
New York's Indian Consulate hosted the dance play Ramleela.
17 hours ago
Warmest Mahavir Jayanti greetings from US President Biden to Jain community
17 hours ago
Responding to the US ban, TikTok invokes the right to free speech
17 hours ago
Legislators of Indian American descent at odds over Israel funding deal
18 hours ago
Congress’ list of 38 more candidates for Andhra Pradesh Assembly polls out
18 hours ago
The future is here; Inspiring performance: Wishes pour in for Gukesh after Candidates win
18 hours ago
Bhavesh, Simranpreet win second 25m pistol Olympic Selection Trials
18 hours ago
Raakhee Gulzar wore bangles during downtime to stay in the skin of 'Aamar Boss’ character
18 hours ago
Divya Khossla-starrer ‘Hero Heeroine’ to be shot across 35 locations in Hyderabad