Q. When will the rule publish in the Federal Register?
A. The proposed rule will officially publish in the Federal Register in the coming weeks. Once the proposed rule is officially published, the public will be able to submit comments for 60 days, beginning on the day the rule publishes in the Federal Register. Instructions for submitting comments will be included in the rule published in the Federal Register. DHS will carefully consider the public comments received during the 60-day comment period.
Please do not submit comments before the official publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register.
Q. When does this rule go into effect?
A. With the advance posting of the NPRM on its website and in the Federal Register, DHS is announcing a proposed rule, not a final rule. After DHS carefully considers public comments received on the proposed rule, DHS plans to issue a final public charge rule that will include an effective date. In the interim, and until a final rule is in effect, USCIS will continue to apply the current public charge policy ( i.e., the 1999 INS Interim Field Guidance).
Q. What changes does the rule propose?
A. The proposed rule would change the standard that DHS uses when determining whether an alien is likely to become a â€œpublic charge,â€ at any time in the future and is therefore inadmissible and ineligible for adjustment of status or admission into the United States. The rule would also make nonimmigrant aliens who receive or are likely to receive designated public benefits above the designated threshold generally ineligible for change of status and extension of stay.
Q. Who is subject to the public charge inadmissibility ground?
A. Individuals seeking immigrant or nonimmigrant visas abroad, individuals seeking admission to the United States on immigrant or nonimmigrant visas, and individuals seeking to adjust their status from within the United States. The proposed rule also would consider certain receipt of public benefits by individuals within the United States in a nonimmigrant (i.e., temporary) status who are seeking to either extend their stay or change their status.
While some lawful permanent residents can be subject to the public charge ground of inadmissibility because specific circumstances dictate that they be considered applicants for admission, most lawful permanent residents are not subject to inadmissibility determinations, including public charge inadmissibility. Therefore, lawful permanent residents who subsequently apply for naturalization would not be subject to inadmissibility determinations, including a public charge inadmissibility determination.
Q. Who is exempt from this rule?
A. Congress has exempted certain classes of aliens from the public charge ground of inadmissibility. For instance, refugees, asylees, and Afghans and Iraqis with special immigrant visas are exempt from public charge.
In addition, DHS is proposing not to consider in the context of a public charge determination, receipt of public benefits by alien members of the U.S. armed forces, serving in active duty or in any of the Ready Reserve components, or received by the alien spouse or children of such service members. Similarly, DHS would not consider Medicaid benefits received by foreign-born children, as defined in section 101(c) of the INA, who either have U.S. citizen parents, have been adopted by U.S. citizen parents, or who are coming to the United States to be adopted by U.S. citizens, and where such children will automatically acquire citizenship pursuant to section 320 or 322 of the INA upon or soon after their admission to the United States.
Q. Which benefits are included in public charge inadmissibility determinations?
A. Public charge adjudications would only account for receipt of designated public benefits, including cash assistance for income maintenance, Medicaid (with limited exceptions for Medicaid benefits paid for an â€œemergency medical condition,â€ and for certain disability services related to education), Medicare Part D Low Income Subsidy, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, or food stamps), any benefit provided for institutionalization for long-term care at government expense, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance, and Public Housing.
The covered benefits generally represent the largest Federal programs for low-income people by total expenditure that address basic living needs such as income, housing, food, and medical care.
Under the proposed rule, receipt of public benefits that are not covered by the 1999 Interim Field Guidance (i.e., Medicaid, the Medicare Part D Low Income Subsidy, SNAP, and the designated housing benefits) would not be considered for public charge purposes unless the receipt occurred after a final rule becomes effective.
Q. What amount of public assistance matters?
A. The proposed rule contains three different types of thresholds, as follows:
The proposed threshold for those benefits that can be monetized easily (cash benefits, SNAP or food stamps, and Section 8 vouchers and rental assistance) is 15 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG) for a household of one within any period of 12 consecutive months, based on the per-month FPG for the months during which the benefits are received. For 2018, the equivalent 15 percent of the FPG dollar value is $1,821. As a result, under the proposed rule, if DHS determines that within any period of 12 consecutive months, an individual is likely to receive these â€œmonetizableâ€ benefits in a cumulative amount above the threshold, DHS would consider the alien inadmissible and ineligible for adjustment of status on public charge grounds.
The proposed threshold for those benefits that cannot be monetized easily (Medicaid, the Medicare Part D Low Income Subsidy, and Public Housing) is receipt of such benefits for more than 12 months in the aggregate within a 36-month period (such that, for instance, receipt of two non-monetizable benefits in one month counts as two months). As a result, under the proposed rule, if DHS determines that in any 36-month period in the future, an individual is likely to receive these â€œnon-monetizableâ€ benefits for a cumulative duration above the threshold, DHS would consider the alien inadmissible and ineligible for adjustment of status on public charge grounds.
The proposed rule also contains a third standard, under which a person would be considered likely to become a public charge if he or she is likely to receive a monetizable benefit below the threshold, plus one or more non-monetizable benefits for longer than 9 months.
Q. What period of benefits receipt is considered?
A. By law, the public charge inadmissibility determination is a prospective determination based on the totality of the circumstances. In making this determination, DHS would consider any current and past receipt of included public benefits above the designated thresholds as a factor in the totality of the circumstances to the extent probative in the determination; e.g., receipt of a small amount of public benefits for a short period of time many years ago would be less probative then more recent receipt of a greater amount and longer duration. The proposed rule also contains a â€œheavily weighted negative factorâ€ for current receipt of public benefits or past receipt above the designated threshold within the past 36 months, i.e., within the past 36 months preceding the time of submission of an application or petition.
Q. Whose benefits are considered?
A. Under the proposed rule, DHS would only consider the direct receipt of benefits by the individual alien applicant. Receipt of benefits by dependents and other household members would not be considered in determining whether the alien applicant is likely to become a public charge. Similarly, any income derived from such benefits received by other household members could not be considered as part of the alien applicantâ€™s household income.
Q. Which benefits are not considered?
A. Many benefits are not considered as part of the proposed rule. In fact, the rule does not include consideration of emergency medical assistance, disaster relief, national school lunch programs, foster care and adoption, and head start. While the Department will take public comments on what benefits should be included or excluded, it is important to note that the proposed rule only includes certain public benefit programs mentioned above.
Q. How will DHS determine whether someone is likely to become a public charge for admission or adjustment purposes?
A. Inadmissibility based on the public charge ground is determined by looking at the mandatory factors set forth in INA section 212(a)(4) and making a determination of the applicantâ€™s likelihood of becoming a public charge at any time in the future based on the totality of the circumstances. This means that the adjudicating officer must weigh both the positive and negative factors when determining whether someone is likely at any time in the future to become a public charge. At a minimum, a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officer must consider the following factors when making a public charge inadmissibility determination:
Assets, Resources, and Financial status; and
Education and skills.
DHS is also proposing to consider the alienâ€™s prospective immigration status, expected period of admission, and affidavit of support, when an affidavit of support is required under section 212(a)(4)(C) or (D) of the Act.
Q. What factors weigh heavily in favor of a determination that alien is likely to become a public charge?
A. The following factors would generally weigh heavily in favor of a finding that an alien is likely to become a public charge:
The alien is not a full-time student and is authorized to work, but is unable to demonstrate current employment, and has no employment history or no reasonable prospect of future employment;
The alien is currently receiving or is currently certified or approved to receive one or more of the designated public benefits above the threshold;
The alien has received one or more of the designated public benefits above the threshold within the 36 months immediately preceding the alienâ€™s application for a visa, admission, or adjustment of status;
The alien has been diagnosed with a medical condition that is likely to require extensive medical treatment or institutionalization or that will interfere with the alienâ€™s ability to provide for him- or herself, attend school, or work, and the alien is uninsured and has no prospect of obtaining private health insurance; or
The alien had previously been found inadmissible or deportable based on public charge.
Q. What factors would weigh heavily against a determination that an alien is likely to become a public charge?
A. The following factors would weigh heavily against a finding that an alien is likely to become a public charge:
The alien has financial assets, resources, and support of at least 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of the alienâ€™s household size; or
The alien is authorized to work and is currently employed with an annual income of at least 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of the alienâ€™s household size.
USCIS Publishes Q&As On Proposed Change to Public Charge Ground of Inadmissibility
Q. When will the rule publish in the Federal Register?